Recently, contactless energy transfer (CET) systems have been developed
and investigated widely. This innovative technology creates new possibilities
to supply mobile devices with electrical energy because elimination of
cables, connectors, and/or slip rings increases reliability and maintenance-free
operation of such critical systems as in aerospace, biomedical, and robotics
applications. FIG. 1 shows a classification of the CET systems.
As "medium" for CET could be used electromagnetic waves, including
light, acoustic waves (sound), as well as electric fields. In the most
popular applications, the core of CET system is inductive or capacitive
coupling between power source and load, and high switching frequency
converter.
The capacitive coupling ( FIG. 2b) is used in low power range (e.g.,
supply systems for sensors) whereas inductive coupling ( FIG. 2a) allows
transferring power from a few milliwatts up to hundred kilowatts. It
should be noted that there is no commonly accepted nomenclature in CET
systems. Some authors use the term "wireless" instead of "contactless" energy
transfer or power supply. However, the term "wireless" energy
transfer (or power supply) is used mostly to describe systems where energy
is transferred on longer distances (several meters), like for cellular
phones or wireless sensor technologies.
In this section, only inductive coupled CET systems are discussed. The
potential applications for such a technology are practically endless
and can range from the transfer of energy between low-power home and
office devices to high-power industrial applications. Medical, marine,
and other applications where physical electrical contact might be dangerous
(battery chargers), impossible, or very problematic, are all prospective
candidates for the use of CET systems.
Because of many parameters used in specification of a CET system, it
has to be designed and adapted to individual conditions and there is
no one universal solution. In spite of many works presenting individual
solutions of inductive coupled CET systems, there is no commonly accepted
control and design methodology. Because of high switching frequency (fsw
≥ 20 kHz) used in CET converters, most of the reported systems have been
built in hardware technology and implemented control and protection methods
were characteristic for hardware-based approach.
However, in the last time more sophisticated methods are development
and implemented in digital signal processors or programmable logical
controllers, like field-programmable gate array (FPGA) circuits.
FIG. 1 Classification of contactless/wireless energy transfer systems.
Load position detection and validation on variable-phase contactless
energy transfer desktops
FIG. 2 Inductive (a) and capacitive (b) coupling used in CET systems.
Load position detection and validation on variable-phase contactless
energy transfer desktops
FIG. 3 Block scheme of CET system. Load position detection and validation
on variable-phase contactless energy transfer desktops
2. Basic Principles of Operation
FIG. 3 shows the block diagram of typical inductive coupled CET systems.
It consists of primary side DC/AC resonant converter, which converts
DC into high-frequency AC energy. Next the AC energy via transformer
with inductive coupling factor k is transmitted to the secondary side.
The secondary side is not connected electrically with primary and, therefore,
can be movable (linearly or/and rotating), giving flexibility, mobility,
and safety for supplied loads. In the secondary side, the high-frequency
AC energy is converted safely by AC/DC converter to meet the requirements
specified by the load parameters.
In most cases, a diode rectifier with capacitive filter is used as AC/DC
converter.
However, in some applications an active rectifier or inverter (for stabilized
DC or AC loads) is required. Hence, the inductive coupled CET system
consists mainly of a large air gap transformer and resonant converter.
2.1 Compensation Topologies
In conventional applications, a transformer is used for galvanic insulation
between source and load, and its operation is based on high magnetic
coupling factor k between primary and secondary windings. Because of
used two-halves cores and/or air gap, CET transformers usually operate
under much lower magnetic coupling factor. As a result, the main inductance
L12 (see TBL. 1) is very small whereas leakage inductances (L11, L22)
are large as compared with conventional transformers.
Consequently, increase in magnetizing current causes higher conducting
losses. Also, winding losses increase because of large leakage inductances.
Another disadvantage of transformers with relatively large gap is electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC) problem (strong radiation). To minimize the above
disadvantages of CET transformers, several power conversion topologies
have been proposed, which can be classified into the following categories:
the flyback, resonant, quasi-resonant, and self-resonant. The common
thing for all these topologies is that they all utilize the energy stored
in the transformer. In most applications, a resonant soft switching technique
is used because it allows both compensation of the transformer leakage
inductance and reduction of power converter switching losses. To form
resonant circuits and compensate for the large CET transformer leakage
inductances, two methods can be applied: S-series or P-parallel, giving
four basic topologies: SS,
SP, PS, and PP (first letter denotes primary and second a secondary
compensation-see TBL. 1).
The PS and PP topologies require an additional series inductor to regulate
the inverter current flowing into the parallel resonant tank. This additional
inductor increases EMC distortion, converter size, and the total cost
of CET system.
Assuming the same numbers of primary and secondary winding, N1 = N2,
the basic parameters of SS and SP topologies have been summarized in
TBL. 2, where GV = u2/u1-voltage output-input transfer function of CET
system; ω = ωs/ω0-normalized frequency; k-magnetic coupling factor; and
R0-load resistance on the secondary side.
Comparing SS with SP parameters, it can be seen that selected topology
influences strongly the correct choice of the primary capacitance. An
important advantage of SS topology is that primary capacitance is independent
of either magnetic coupling factor or the load. Contrary to this, the
SP topology depends on coupling factor and requires higher value of capacitance
for stronger magnetic coupling.
TBL. 1 Variants of Leakage Inductance Compensation Circuits
2.2 Resonant Power Converters
Resonant power converters contain resonant L-C networks, also called
resonant circuit (RC) or resonant tank network, whose voltage and current
waveforms vary sinusoidally during one or more subintervals of each switching
period. These converters contain low total harmonic distortion because
switching frequency is equal to first harmonic frequency. Basic power
converter topologies used in CET systems are presented in FIG. 4. The
full-bridge ( FIG. 4c) inverter, composed of four switches and an RC,
is commonly used in high power applications. The half-bridge inverter
( FIG. 4a) has only two switches and two others can be replaced by capacitors
( FIG. 4b). The output voltage μ1 of the fullbridge converter is doubled
when compared with half-bridge topology.
TBL. 2 Basic Parameters of Compensation Circuits
FIG. 4 Basic topologies of series resonant converter and resonant circuit
voltage u1(t) waveforms. (a) Half-bridge unipolar converter, (b) half-bridge
bipolar converter, and (c) full-bridge converter.
The main advantage of resonant technique is reduction of switching losses
via mechanisms known as zero current switching (ZCS) and zero voltage
switching (ZVS). The switch-on and/or switch-off converter semiconductor
components can occur only at zero crossing of the resonant quasi-sinusoidal
waveforms. This eliminates some of the switching loss mechanisms. Hence,
switching losses are reduced, and resonant converters can operate at
switching frequencies that are considerably higher than in comparable
pulse width modulation (PWM) hard switching converters. ZVS can also
eliminate or reduce some of the electromagnetic emission sources, also
known as electromagnetic interference.
Another advantage is that both ZVS and ZCS converters can utilize transformer
leakage inductance and diode junction capacitors as well as the output
parasitic capacitor of the power switch.
However, resonant converters exhibit several disadvantages. Although,
the components of an RC can be chosen such that good performance with
high efficiency is obtained at a single operating point, typically it
is difficult to optimize the resonant components in such a way that good
performance is obtained over a wide range of load currents and input
voltages variations. Significant currents may circulate through the tank
components, even when the load is removed, leading to poor efficiency
at light loads.
Therefore, the converter used in CET system has to be carefully designed.
Typical steady-state waveforms of the voltages u1, u2; currents i1,
i2; and primary side power P1 in an insulated gate bipolar transistor-based
CET resonant full-bridge converter with series-series compensation for
operation at resonance frequency are presented in FIG. 5. The rotatable
transformer air gap is 25.5 mm, the load resistance 10 Ω, and transferred
power is 2.5 kW. It can be seen that resonant converter operates
with zero primary current switching.
3. Review of CET Systems
Depending on the power range and air gap length, different transformer
cores can be used. A general overview representing a typical construction
of inductive coupling used in CET systems is shown in FIG. 6. It can
be seen that for high power and low air gap, transformers with magnetic
cores in primary and secondary side are applied. Contrary to this, for
large air gap and low power, air transformers (coreless) are preferred.
A special case is a sliding transformer that can have construction for
linear or circular movement (see Section 35.6). The final configuration
of CET systems also depends strongly on the number of loads to be supplied.
In such cases, transformers with multi-winding secondary or primary side
are used.
In the next subsection, some selected examples of inductive coupled
CET systems are presented.
4. CET Systems with Multiple Secondary Winding
The CET system of FIG. 3 can be equipped with multiple secondary winding,
as shown in FIG. 7. This is a very flexible solution in which several
isolated and/or moving loads can be supplied. In situations when stabilized
AC or DC loads are required, an additional active DC/AC or DC/DC converter
has to be added ( FIG. 7). Of course, it results in additional losses
and efficiency reduction.
Based on this idea, a CET system has been proposed which
can be compared to a plug-and socket extension cable. Instead of inserting
a plug into a socket, a connection between supply line (cable) and loads
(clamps) is established using CET. Also, ABB Corporate Research, Ladenburg,
Germany, has developed a factory communication and wireless power supply
system for sensors and actuators called WISA. In this solution, a coreless
single winding primary side (constructed in form of a frame) is coupled
with distributed multiple secondary windings to supply sensors and actuators
with 10 mW output power each.
The transformers used in the system of FIG. 7 can have different construction:
stationary, rotating, rotatable, with magnetic core, or coreless. As
an example a rotating transformer with double parallel connected secondary
windings is used in CET systems for the power supply of airborne radar
systems.
FIG. 5 Steady-state waveforms of the voltages u1, u2; currents i1,
i2; and primary side power P1 in an IGBT transistor-based CET resonant
full-bridge converter with series-series compensation (operation at resonance
frequency).
FIG. 6 Power range of inductive coupling-based CET systems versus air
gap wide.
FIG. 7 CET system with multiple secondary winding.
5. CET Systems with Cascaded Transformers
In FIG. 8, a CET system used in power supply for robots and manipulators
is shown.
The indirect DC link AC/DC/AC power converter generates a square wave
voltage of 200-600 V and 20-60 kHz frequency. This voltage is fed to
the primary winding of first rotatable transformer located on the first
axis of the robot. The transformer secondary side is connected to the
next DC link AC/DC/AC power converter, which using PWM technique generates
variable frequency AC voltage to supply first three-phase motor. The
transformer secondary side is also connected to the primary side of the
next rotatable transformer, which is located on the second joint of the
robot. The transformer feeds the second axis drive in similar way as
described above for the first machine. More transformers may be added
to create arrangement of an AC bus throughout the robot. Similar system
is applied for multilayer optical disc used in data storage systems [14].
However, the output power in optical disc is in the range of 20-30 mW,
whereas in robots supply is 10-20 kW.
FIG. 8 CET system with cascaded transformers.
FIG. 9 Basic configuration of CET system with sliding transformer;
(a) for linear movement, (b) for circular movement.
6. CET Systems with Sliding Transformers
The contactless electrical energy delivery systems used in long distance
are based on sliding transformers with long primary windings. Basically,
two configurations are applied: primary winding forming elongated loop
as long as range of receiver movement is required ( FIG. 9a) or circular
form for circular movement ( FIG. 9b). The output converter(s) and load(s)
are directly connected to secondary winding placed on movable magnetic
core.
The sliding magnetic core constructions enable movement of secondary
winding along the primary winding loop (Figures 9 and 10). The sliding
transformer gives possibility to construct long contactless, electrical
energy delivery systems for mobile receivers. These transformer cores
are composed of many strips of magnetic materials. Regarding magnetic
and mechanical properties, the amorphous or nanocrystalline magnetic
materials are preferable. However, when high dynamic properties of mobile
receiver are required, some problem may appear because of core inertia.
Heavy magnetic core is fixed with the energy receiver ( FIG. 10); therefore,
it increases mass of the secondary side. The length of primary winding
is in the range of 1-70 m and output power 1-200 kW.
7. CET Systems with Multiple Primary Winding
7.1 Introduction
Electronic devices like mobile phones, multimedia- and music players,
laptops, and many more are used daily by countless people all around
the world. Many of these devices are fitted with a battery, which allows
them to operate independently and without drawing power continuously
from the power utility network. However, these devices need to be periodically
recharged, since their batteries can only store a finite amount of power.
These devices operate with relatively low DC voltage levels (typically
5-12 V) compared to the high utility voltage of 240 V AC (120 V AC in
the United States), and thus almost always require an AC-to-DC converter
(also called a charger) to accomplish this.
With a multitude of different devices available around the world, it
makes for quite a lot of chargers.
Also, most devices come with their own unique chargers. Using various
different chargers with unique specifications and plugs can be bothersome
and irritating. From a consumer point of view, charging these devices
using only one universal charger would be great; it would be even better
if this charger could charge multiple devices at a time without even
plugging them into a socket, but by simply placing them close to the
charger itself.
FIG. 10 Example of sliding transformer construction for linearly moving
secondary.
Load position detection and validation on variable-phase contactless
energy transfer desktops.
One increasingly popular technology for powering these devices without
using adaptors is through the use of CET system. CET is the process in
which electrical energy is transferred among two or more electrical devices
through inductive coupling as opposed to energy transfer through conventional "plug
and socket" connectors.
Different CET charging platforms for these applications have been proposed.
One approach is based on a CET charging platform with a single spiral
inductor. Here the inductive coupling between the primary inductor and
a similar inductor installed into a mobile phone is used to transfer
power. With only a single primary and secondary winding however, the
phone needs to be placed in a very specific position so that the windings
overlap each other exactly. The phone is thus restricted to a certain
area wherein it can be charged.
In CET applications where a high degree of freedom regarding the placement
of CET devices is required, the use of multiple primary inductors is
a popular choice. One such CET charging platform is presented
in FIG. 11a. Here multiple planar inductors arranged to form a matrix
are embedded in a CET charging platform or into a section of an office
table ( FIG. 11b). When small consumer electronic devices, like mobile
phones, PDAs, multimedia- and music players, and even laptops fitted
with similar inductors are placed on the platform, power is transferred
from the CET platform (transmitter) to the CET devices (receivers) through
inductive coupling.
FIG. 11 (a) CET receiver objects randomly placed on a CET-enabled platform
for charging. (b) The CET platform showing multiple inductors underneath
the CET platform.
7.2 Planar Inductor Windings
At the heart of any CET system lies the primary and secondary inductors
that form the inductive link and allow power to be transferred between
the transmitter and receiver. Their geometries play a vital role in determining
the power transfer capability and efficiency of the system. In applications
like these, where the size of the inductors, especially the secondary,
is very limited, spiral planar winding inductors are often used. Hexagon
spiral windings, in particular, use the available surface area very effectively
and can be placed in a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice or matrix without
any openings between the windings. Furthermore, the distribution of the
magnetic field produced by these windings is unique as they produce a
strong z-component, which make them especially suited for applications
where the primary and secondary inductor placements are parallel to each
other. Produced as copper tracks on (flexible) PCB, they can also be
easily and cheaply manufactured.
FIG. 12a shows an actual hexagon spiral winding produced on PCB; FIG.
12b shows its graphical representation; and FIG. 12c shows a matrix of
hexagon spiral windings.
FIG. 12 (a) An actual hexagon spiral winding produced as copper tracks
on a PCB, and (b) its graphical representation used in this work. (c)
A matrix of hexagon spiral windings. Load position detection and validation
on variable-phase contactless energy transfer desktops.
7.3 Electromagnetic Design
The design of a CET system is multidisciplinary in nature and is concentrated
in various research fields.
First, and perhaps most importantly, is the electromagnetic investigation.
Here, methods for modeling the various important parameters of the CET
inductors are created. These include methods for estimating the distribution
of the magnetic field intensity, the self- and mutual winding inductances,
and their AC resistances. For CET systems void of any soft magnetic materials,
as the variable-phase CET desktop presented in, the magnetic vector potential
and Biot-Savart methods can be used.
In CET systems where soft magnetic materials are used for shielding
purposes, these methods can no longer be directly used. Here, the finite
element method is a popular choice.
FIG. 13a and b shows the distribution of the magnetic field as calculated
by the developed model.
Here FIG. 13a shows the distribution of the magnetic field in a xy-plane
parallel to the winding at a height of 1 mm above the winding, and FIG.
13b shows the magnetic field at 5 mm.
FIG. 13 Distribution of the magnetic field z-component in a xy-plane
parallel to the hexagon spiral inductor calculated at (a) 1 mm above
the inductor, and (b) 5 mm above the inductor.
In general, CET. platforms for these applications use planar inductors
with radii between 10 and 30 mm, switching frequencies between 500 kHz
and several megahertz. The air gaps are usually limited between 1 and
10 mm.
FIG. 14 A simplified schematic diagram of power transfer to load ZL.
7.4 Power Electronics Implementation
The power electronics investigation focuses on the design and implementation
of the power electronic systems needed to transfer and control the power
delivered over the inductive link. Using the lumped parameters obtained
from the electromagnetic investigation, the CET link is modeled as a
lossy transformer.
The coupling between the primary and secondary windings is often much
weaker compared to traditional iron-cored transformers, and to increase
the overall power transfer efficiency, resonance is often used.
The circuit equations that govern the transfer of power from the primary
winding to the secondary load can be written in phasor notation: capacitor,
acts as a band-pass filter, allowing only the fundamental switching current
to flow through in the primary winding.
To control the primary current, and to keep it constant during loaded
and non-loaded operations, a PI or hysteresis current controller can
also be implemented. This can be programmed in a micro-controller.
Coil commutation circuits are also used in certain CET platforms for
switching the current into the different primary windings.
7.5 Operational Features
The CET platform operational features refer to certain technical and
non-technical attributes and characteristics that need to be implemented
into the system in order to make it user friendly, safe, and operate
logically, within its working environment.
One of these important operational features is the location and authentication
of valid CET devices placed on the CET platform. From a practical point
of view, a CET platform used in an office environment might also contain
objects that are not CET-enabled and should not be charged. Some of these
objects can be metallic in nature, like a bunch of keys, a soft-drink
can, pens, coins, etc. Exciting the primary windings close to these conductive
objects could create eddy currents and result in undesired heating of
the objects. Other objects, like magnets and ferrites, with high permeability
can also interfere with the normal operation of a CET desktop or platform,
and should thus be avoided. In a method is devised to locate the position
and distinguish between three possible object types placed on the CET
platform. These are: metallic objects, magnetic objects, and valid CET
devices. FIG. 15a shows a CET platform filled with various CET and non-CET
devices. FIG. 15b shows an image of an actual metallic and magnetic materials
placed on an implemented CET platform for testing. Here object A is a
60 mm aluminum office key, object B is a toroidal ferrite core, object
C is two ferrite E-cores, and object D is a piece of copper plate. Due
to their unique influences on the primary winding impedances, they can
all be located and distinguished.
Other operational features which could be implemented in a CET platform
include periodic scanning of the CET platform to locate newly placed
CET devices. Also, audible user feedback tones can be implemented to
notify the user when a new CET device is located and powered or when
a device is fully charged or removed from the platform. From a safety
perspective, the constant monitoring of the current and voltage levels
of excited primary windings could indicate potential problems if the
values fall outside certain allowed range.
FIG. 15 (a) A CET platform with various CET and non-CET objects randomly
placed on its surface, and (b) image from an actual CET platform showing
a few different metallic and ferrite materials that the CET platform
can distinguish.
[coming soon] TBL. 3 Overview of Inductive Coupled CET Systems
8. Summary and Conclusion
A brief review of basic CET systems, with special focus on inductively
coupled solution, is given in this section. Several groups of application
with typical specification are summarized in TBL. 3.
Key conclusions include the following:
• The CET systems are used in power range from milliwatts (biomedicine,
sensors, actuators, etc.) till several hundred kilowatts (cranes, fast
battery charging).
• The final efficiency achieved by inductively coupled CET systems is
in the range of 60%-90% for low and high power applications, respectively.
• In high power (>1 kW), transformers with core winding are applied.
• In low power (<100 mW), air gap coupling and very high transmission
frequency from 100 kHz till several (MHz) is preferred.
• For long-distance mobile loads, CET systems with sliding transformers
are used.
• There is no one standard solution of CET system; every design has
to take into account several specific parameters and user conditions.